![]() He's a veteran technology writer, editor, and reviewer with more than 15 years experience. ![]() He's fascinated by how photographers create, considering the fact that he's legally blind./ HIGHLIGHTS: Chris used to work in Men's lifestyle and tech. ![]() He's the author of various product guides, educational pieces, product reviews, and interviews with photographers. Chris's editorial work includes not only editing and scheduling articles but also writing them himself. He provides oversight to all of the daily tasks, including editorial, administrative, and advertising work. When you shoot those, you’ll truly have fun and enjoy the results.Ĭheck out Lomography’s page listing to pick some of this film up, or check Amazon for prices.Ĭhris Gampat is the Editor in Chief, Founder, and Publisher of the Phoblographer. It’s good for portraits and landscapes of all types. I truthfully don’t see it as a good general film though. I’d prefer to use it in the studio and in 120 format. I personally like the feel of Lomography Color Negative 100. Could I have warmed up the image quality? Yes, but then that wouldn’t be true to how the film actually works. These scans are right out of the scanner. Instead, shoot in scenes with a whole lot of light (daylight) or in a studio. You’ll get some very blue colors you may not digg so much. With that said, I honestly don’t recommend shooting it a lot in the shade. Lomography Color Negative 100 delivers the best results when you give it a bit more light. During the Golden Hour it’s very beautiful. In my opinion, where I found this film to truly succeed is with lots of natural light. But in shade, it goes very blue–bluer than I’ve honestly seen before. Interestingly enough, when working in the studio and with studio lighting, Lomography Color Negative 100 will come up looking very warm. ![]() Just shoot at ISO 100 and overexpose by around 1 stop or 1/3rd and you’ll be all set. But in all reality, that won’t matter much. Because it’s a Kodak film, you may think to yourself that maybe you should expose for ISO 50 and develop for like ISO 75. So in most situations, you’re best off giving it a bit more light than a light meter tells you to do. Lomography Color Negative 100 is a negative film. Thanks guys! Tech Specsįilms, Lomography Film, Lomography 35mm Film, 35mm Film, 35mm Color Negative, Color Negative Film, 35mm Color Negative, Lomography Color Negative Films, Film Photography Day, 15% OFF on Lomography films, Little Treats, Festive Film Deal, LC-A+ & LC-W Accessory Deals Additionally, studio tests were done using the Adorama Flashpoint Zoom Lion and the Phottix Luna Octabank.Īll film in this post was gracious developed by Lomography NYC. We tested Lomography Color Negative 100 with the Minolta a7, Sony 35mm f1.4, Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax 28mm f2.8, Pentax 50mm f1.4, Fujifilm GW690 III, Leica CL, Leica 40mm f2, and various ND filters. If you’re in natural light, you’ll want to overexpose a bit but that can be said for pretty much any negative film emulsion.In shade, it just intensifies the blue cast that you’re bound to get.With a studio light, it can be exceptionally sharp.But either way, if you’re looking for a low ISO alternative because you don’t like Kodak Ektar’s colors, then Lomography Color Negative 100 is a very viable option. At times, I genuinely feel like Lomography Color Negative 100 sometimes just intensifies whatever scene is just in front of you. To that end, so too is Lomography Color Negative 100. But in truth, it’s capable of delivering some seriously lovely colors. Now, some folks may scoff at the idea of shooting Kodak Gold since for years, it was designed for being shot by just consumers. ![]() The film is one of the offerings from Lomography that is also a more affordable option at times in both 35mm and 120. “It’s Kodak Gold,” I’m often told by Lomography reps about Lomography Color Negative 100. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |